Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Elahi Galan vs Adrian Mannarino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Galan vs Mannarino analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Elahi Galan vs Adrian Mannarino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Galan 0 - 0 Mannarino
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Galan has won 46.82% of points on his second serve, while Mannarino has won 49.72%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Galan, in recent form, has won 51.41% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mannarino has won 46.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.48% and 26.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Galan has saved 59.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mannarino has saved 55.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Galan has won 47.69% of matches played (W/L 31/ 34), with Mannarino winning 59.38% (W/L 38/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Galan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 251/ 179), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 15% (W/L 3/ 17). Mannarino has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 61% (W/L 93/ 59), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 75/ 121).
- Player level: In the last year, Galan has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 46.43% of matches (W/L 13/ 15), where as Mannarino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 64.86% of matches (W/L 24/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Galan has played against opponents with an average rank of 203.2 while Mannarino has played against players with an average rank of 125.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Galan has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mannarino has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Galan has converted 37.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mannarino has converted 37.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Galan 0 - 0 Mannarino
90
Rank
56
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
21
Rank
17
High
35
Age
L
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
55% (366-299)
Career Total W/L
56% (663-524)
44% (11-14)
YTD W/L
37% (7-12)
$1,431,455
Career Prize Money
$6,668,510
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Elahi Galan | Adrian Mannarino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (11/14) | 37% (7/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (28/35) | 39% (20/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (289/329) | 44% (205/256) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 38% (5/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 127 | 95 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:13 | 1:57:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 172.32 | 104.79 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1266/2114) | 62% (884/1417) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (840/1266) | 68% (597/884) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (397/848) | 50% (265/533) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (67/181) | 38% (36/96) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (782/2030) | 34% (480/1422) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/4) | 20% (1/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 54% (7/6) | 25% (2/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (10/23) | 27% (4/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 75% (3/4) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (8/12) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (16/4) | 0% (10/0) |
Daniel Elahi Galan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Christopher Eubanks
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Radu Albot
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
109
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
71%
(
69 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
3
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Adrian Mannarino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Adrian Mannarino
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Adrian Mannarino
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Adrian Mannarino
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Adrian Mannarino
64%
(
75 of
118)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
38%
(
45 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
3-6 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Adrian Mannarino
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Tomas Machac
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Adrian Mannarino
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
19 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
68
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Adrian Mannarino
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
James Duckworth
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
45
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Galan Vs Mannarino Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
